We Are Electric

|

Our own Sally Adee has her first book coming out this month. Following ancient Last Word on Nothing tradition, I nominated myself to sit down with Sally for a Q&A about We Are Electric: Inside the 200-year Hunt for Our Body’s Bioelectric Code, and What the Future Holds.

Jessa: My first real sense of you, a decade ago, was of a plucky girl reporter who talked your way into DARPA to have your brain zapped while you learned riflery at double speed. Now I see that this completely science fiction-style episode was actually the start of a longer journey for you that has led to this book. Can you tell me about this inciting incident?

Sally: A few years before I joined Last Word on Nothing, I was an intern at IEEE Spectrum, a magazine aimed at electrical engineers. I was on the semi-conductor beat because nobody wanted it, basically. One of the things that was brilliant about that beat was that I was able to do a lot of stories around the chips they were designing to do neuro-integration.

In that space between biology and electricity, I did a big series on the Revolutionizing Prosthetics project at DARPA, where Dean Kamen had developed an interface between a prosthetic arm and the remaining biological limb. He was dealing with all sorts of problems people don’t think about when it comes to interfacing with electricity—and with metallic devices—and it started to plant the seed in my head, like how does it all work? How does artificial electricity, applied to the body or into the brain, affect neurons?

This was all swimming around in my brain and then I met this DARPA program manager Amy Kruse, whom you know. She told me about this project with accelerated learning, and I couldn’t believe it. I’d always been used to thinking about neural interfaces as a matter of prosthetics and regaining function, or output. I had done a lot of stories about people who make these robot arms that open and close with your neural signal, but then I was like, so wait, if you put electricity into the brain it makes something better with the brain? So it was very, what are you talking about?

When I got to New Scientist, it was much more the type of publication where you could try a gonzo stunt like experimenting on yourself in the service of science journalism. After years of trying to get DARPA to open up about the program, I guess they had had some credible results by then and I was able to actually gain a foothold and go and do that little experiment.

I wonder whether I would do it now, having had children, but at the time I was like, what do I care – fry my brain, I want to know! And I was thinking I’m sure it’s either not going to work or it’ll work. I’m sure it’s not going to absolutely fry my brain because I think DARPA does take some care not to get into really awful experiments. It wasn’t like I was going to have deep brain stimulation. I really wanted the story.

Jessa: So that’s how bioelectricity started for you – let’s talk a bit about how it started as a field. We learn about electricity primarily in physics class and I think for a lot of people there’s going to be this feeling that that was an obvious place to put it, and what they will quickly learn in your book is that there are different types of electricity. We’ve become biased toward one and it’s sort of an accident of history that that happened. How did physics come to dominate over biology?

Sally: People from antiquity had been curious about electricity in its manifestations, like if you rub a piece of amber it will attract a bunch of little fluff. There were some metallic types of stones that could attract actual known metals, and the ancient Greeks used to hold electric fish on their feet when they had gout or something to relieve the symptoms. Of course everybody knows about lightening. But you can imagine how mysterious and completely unconnected these separate things would have felt or seemed to people before there was some kind of scientific framework to see them through.

Then in the 1600s with the invention of electrostatic generators, people started to be able to play with this stuff and develop theories about how this is all connected. Lightening and the stuff that’s coming out of an electrostatic generator: are those the same thing? Are electric fish actually electric?

That’s when Luigi Galvani starts looking into this idea that maybe what animates our nervous system was not what they had thought for a long time—this big heart idea of having a hydraulic network of nerves all the way around our body filled with something a bit like water, called pneuma psychikon. They thought it’s this hydraulic network that would animate you at the will of your brain.

Galvani had also seen people using electrostatic generators to zap various animals and people, and monks were electrifying crowds of people through wires, and he was like wait a second, what if it’s the same thing? He starts doing years and years of experiments on frogs to try to understand what it is, whether that is a kind of nervous electricity, and whether nervous electricity can join the pantheon of lightening and the stuff that comes out of an electrostatic generator as all being part of the same thing.

Jessa: And he pulls it off.

Sally: Well, sort of. Galvani publishes this paper that is met with rapturous response initially, and then came Alessandro Volta, who was a very ambitious physicist. He wanted to be an “electrician”, which at the time had a much more glamorous connotation than we give it today. It’s sort of on par, or shares a vibe with ‘rocket scientist’. He had ambitions to be the best of the electricians, and he just did not believe Galvani’s contention. He was like, ‘This is an anatomist, what the fuck does he know about electricity.’

They spent five or six years going back and forth with these respectful but quite intense disagreements, and the people around them, when I was reading accounts of it, it reminded me of Twitter. The guys themselves were pretty respectful with their disagreements but the people around them would write letters in support of their guy, sort of like, “He has written with the thunder of truth!” and then the other guy’s paper came out they would switch sides and be like “well, obviously! I’ve also replicated this!”. There was just this very bombastic war where everybody had to choose sides.

In the end, Galvani did demonstrate beyond the shadow of a doubt that the stuff that is in cells was able to transmit a signal that was at the very least chemio-electrical. But from the argument, Volta had actually derived the idea of the voltaic pile which would become the battery. He basically blew everybody out of the water with this invention that was so useful for science. Unfortunately, nobody can ever figure out a use for Galvani’s correct contention that it was an electrical signal that was traveling through the nervous system.

Jessa: That’s a theme that ran throughout your book as you went from that history into the present moment where incredible developments are happening every day in this field. In this case, the timing of a physicist’s discovery sucked up all of the air in the scientific news cycle and suppressed interest in the biological perspective, with consequences that were felt for centuries.

But by much the same token now, genetics has seized the public imagination, and the electric components of what shapes us developmentally have been totally neglected.

Sally: Yeah, so your body plan isn’t determined by your genome. It might code for what color your eyes should be, but it doesn’t determine, for example, how many of those eyes you should have. From a cell’s perspective, when you’ve just been conceived, it needs to proliferate into 40 trillion cells, or whatever it is, in order to make an adult human being. The shape of that adult is incredibly consistent across species, but how does that first cell know? Its first task is actually to tell its left from its right. Because you have to be able to tell your left from your right in order to put two arms on either side and not one in the middle and one on your head, and whatnot.

Michael Levin and others have shown it achieves this through self-electrophoresis. The cell somehow pushes all of its ion channels onto one side of itself, which is what creates the current that drives the first ability to orient itself. Throughout development, electrical currents and voltages are key in shaping us into what we are. And I find that such a wild idea.

Jessa: So that electrical influence is hugely important throughout our lives. When you gave the example of lightening, I was reminded of the now-out-of-fashion view of how life came to be, with the sort of lightening strike into the primordial goo and the idea of the ‘spark of life’. In researching and writing the book, did you gain any further insight into what ‘being alive’ means?

Sally: Yes!! Our ion channels are descendants of the same ion channels that were in some of the first goo—when everything was unicellular life forms. People think of bioelectricity as something that passes our action potentials on, but the nervous system did not invent that; it piggybacked on a much more ancient system. It’s a whole different system of biological communication, and it’s like a command and control center that used to be used just to distinguish self from not-self. Then it got conscripted into how we move and act in the world, and maybe consciousness after that. But the fundamental bit of that is that all of our channels that allow ions to get in and out of our cells, those are some of the oldest things about us.

Before you had a cellular membrane, you could have pieces, but you couldn’t have forces. These forces are crucial in the difference between things that are alive and things that aren’t alive. I don’t think a lightning bolt (except a metaphorical one) was necessary. Once you had a membrane encapsulating a cell, you have an electrical potential. Because if there are ions in the water—which there always have been—you’re going to have an imbalance which is going to give you a membrane potential. Then you get little proteins tunneling through.

So once you have a membrane, and thus an electrical difference, and once there’s an ion channel, and once the cell can figure out how to control those electrical differences—suddenly you have something that is alive.

We Are Electric hits all of the finest bookstores in the UK on Feb 2 and in the US on February 28th. Pre-orders are available online now. You can see her speak at numerous events coming up, including TEDxManchester in March and the Hay Festival in June.

3 thoughts on “We Are Electric

  1. Sorry, I hate to be the one to mention this, but “lightening” and “lightning” are not the same things. The latter involves electrical discharges. I’ll let you look up the former.

    1. I’ve been writing professionally for the better part of a century and I always ALWAYS get that wrong. I thought maybe the Brits spelled the electrical discharge one differently but the UK’s Met Office says “lightning,” and they’d know.

      1. … the better part of a century …

        Thank you. And please don’t stop writing because then we’ll know we’ve reached the worse part of the century. (You didn’t happen to take a hiatus recently did you?)

Comments are closed.

Categorized in: Miscellaneous