Finding the Beauty in Roadkill

Amanda Stronza found the cardinal dead on a Texas highway this June, a splash of vermillion against drab asphalt. He’d been struck by a car—a common fate for birds, as many as 340 million of whom are killed by vehicles in the United States every year. Most drivers overlook these casualties, but not Stronza, an environmental anthropologist at Texas A&M University. She scooped up the cardinal and conveyed him to a quiet place, where she laid him atop moss and covered him with flowers. “His little body weighed nothing…” she wrote when she posted a photo of the bright, tasteful tableau on Instagram. “I’m sorry, beautiful one.”

The paradox of roadkill is that it’s at once conspicuous and invisible: Our highways are lined with so many crushed raccoons and pulverized opossums that we hardly notice them. Stronza’s artistic mission is to make us see the wild deaths humans both inflict and ignore. I first stumbled upon Stronza’s roadkill photography while researching my book Crossings, and was struck by how her unflinching portraits negotiate the difficult balance of celebrating animal lives while lamenting their deaths. “It’s like serving as a witness, or giving a eulogy,” Stronza told me recently. “In that way, I hope that we can be more sensitive to the lives of the animals who share our communities with us.”

Stronza began memorializing animals in 2019, when she found a dead squirrel in downtown Austin. “What struck me in that moment were all the people just streaming past that animal, like she was nothing,” Stronza recalled. She encircled the squirrel with flowers and pinecones, snapped a photo, and published her impromptu tribute on social media, where it went viral. She’s since created memorials for dozens of creatures, including porcupines, skunks, coyotes, turtles, armadillos, and snakes. In the Kalahari Desert this summer, she commemorated a honey badger; in Nepal, she memorialized a langur. She covers wounds with flowers and rocks—not to airbrush death, but to maintain her subjects’ dignity, a practice and ethic that reminds me of the care morticians take in preparing human bodies for open-casket funerals. “I’m always looking for beauty,” she said.

Continue reading

Outright Gifts

This first ran Sept. 22, 2010 — the same time of year as now. It’s not clear that the auction is still going on, and maybe it’s been replaced by a 5K race, and maybe by a bunch of other auctions in different places. The clinic is building a new home and has a lot more staff and treat even more diseases. Holmes and Caroline Morton have certainly retired and you know what? things change and sometimes they get better. Though this was pretty good to begin with, splendid even.

I drove up to an auction in the Pennsylvania hayfields, parked in the field to the left because the lot to the right was reserved for buggies and horses. Maybe five auctions were going on in different parts of the fairground and everywhere were Amish in black and dark jewel-colored clothes, Mennonites in black and light sprigged cottons, all the old Anabaptist sects, the people that locals call “plain folk.”  They spoke a dialect of German you couldn’t understand even if you understand German. They had no-shit faces, meaning they don’t hand it out but if you do, then that’s the kind of person you are.

Kids were quietly all over the place, and a surprising number of them were in wheelchairs – plain peoples’ kids are unusually likely to have genetic diseases that interfere with the way their bodies process proteins, which in turn plays havoc with the parts of their brains that control muscles. The auctions were to raise money for the clinic that treats them, The Clinic For Special Children, which is what the plain people call these kids, God’s special children. The clinic supplies these people who have no telephones, no cars, no electric stoves, no electric lights with what was at the time the only true personalized genetic medicine in the country.

The clinic was started by Holmes Morton, a West Virginia boy who dropped out of high school, talked his way into college, got interested in pediatric neurology, wound up at Harvard Medical School. He worked at a children’s hospital in Philadelphia where he analyzed a case of glutaric aciduria, a disease in which the child is normal at birth, is healthy for months, then one morning gets some common virus and by afternoon, can’t walk, and in the worst cases, can’t sit, talk, or swallow. Abrupt onset like that is the hallmark of a treatable disease, so Morton decided to go out to Pennsylvania Dutch country and meet the family.  In fact, he met a lot of other families with a lot of similar problems, and because he thought glutaric aciduria might be not only treatable but preventable, he wrote a proposal to the National Institutes of Health. He got turned down. So at age 38, he decided to open his own clinic, though he doesn’t remember deciding anything except that the kids needed help. The Wall Street Journal wrote an article about him, and money and lab equipment appeared as if by magic. In November of 1989, the plain people raised the clinic in one rainy day, because that’s how they do things, fast and all together.

The clinic equipment eventually included a genetic sequencing machine, and Morton hired a geneticist. Now during childbirths, which are generally at home, the midwife takes a sample of amniotic fluid and has it couriered to the clinic to be tested for genetic disorders; sometimes the baby hasn’t even been born yet. Babies with genes for a disorder spend the first two years of their lives on special diets and don’t get sick. Kids with less-treatable diseases are tested in the clinic, and though they don’t recover, they don’t get worse. The tests cost a tenth what they would in a commercial lab, results are back in a half hour, and the kids are treated before they leave the office.  The clinic buys its own diagnostic equipment and charges nominal fees; it buys medication wholesale and charges retail.  It’s a model of health care, says Morton’s wife Caroline, the daughter of a country doctor who works in the clinic, “that’s very old.”

The plain people came from a dozen couples who immigrated in the 1700’s, and though they don’t marry cousins, they also don’t marry outside the church.   So a mutation on a gene in one of those dozen couples now runs through a population. Maybe 7,000 people are at the auction. The clinic’s budget is around $1 million a year, and the auction raises a third of it. Everything being auctioned – food, crafts, farm equipment, motor oil, toys, handmade furniture – has been donated outright. A quilt can have 5,000 pieces and take a year to handsew, and during this year’s auction, next year’s quilt was being started.  The quilts are art.  They could be sold commercially for between $1000 and $3000.  And they’re given outright.

I bought a tiny quilt, a wall-hanging really, the Amish dark jewel colors. I heard how much the auction brought in and forget the exact amount but a lot. And back in Baltimore, my life is full of intense people doing interesting things, but that auction was a little disconcerting.  It was also full of intense people but the things they do, the outright gifts, go way beyond interesting.

Credits:  Photos all by, and used with the kind permission of, Mary Caperton Morton.  Holmes Morton is her father.  Much of the information was lifted wholesale from her story, here and here.

Leaving/Imprints

Mom spreads maps over the dining room table. They’re oldish, not ancient, but the home I see in them is not the home I know. They are all of Colorado—mostly cities at the nexus of Rocky Mountains and High Plains, 40, 50, 60 years ago. The outpost of Ward, a funky old mining town up a sinuous dry canyon, guarded by two guys with broadswords. The hopping university town of Fort Collins, then just a smallish scatter of purple squares along a tidy grid of streets. And there’s Boulder in 1957, my hometown, where I’m visiting my family for the turn of the New Year.

We press the map folds flat with our fingers and lean closer. The city then was a tiny yolk at the core of its current footprint, pressed hard against the mountains. The mesa where my parents live formed its eastward boundary, a new neighborhood then, not yet swallowed and sprawled miles beyond with malls and business parks and subdivisions and natural gas wells, the fingers of the city and its neighbors creeping outward over the plains, grasping each other to form an amoeba of light and noise that pulses with traffic along a vasculature of roads. A place forever swallowing itself. Becoming new and new again, without becoming better.

Every time I come back, I grumble about how much things have changed since I was a kid. For all my sharp words, though, there’s something unchanging here. It rises in me when I see the rolling ponderosa-covered waves of the foothills breaking on the snowy, treeless slopes of the high Rockies to the west, when I see the plains reaching boundlessly east, haloed pink at the days’ two turns, from and towards darkness.

Continue reading

Regarding INC5760131 or How to Navigate the Reply-All Apocalypse

It began with a software engineer in India. The man’s email signature says that he works in “Dreams Sustainment (Offshore).” His note with the subject line “Regarding INC5760131” referred to some technical issue that was virtually incomprehensible to anyone who was not among the email’s intended recipients. And there were a lot of unintended recipients. Somehow this poor guy managed to copy everyone working in ESPN content.

That’s a lot of people. ESPN employs about 8,000 people worldwide, and during a single short burst that morning, his misdirected email spawned something like 138 replies. I know this, because I worked for ESPN and was on the receiving end of the email tsunami.

The NC5760131 fiasco was no isolated incident. In 2012, an NYU student accidentally sent a query about his tuition payment to 39,979 other studentsTime Inc and Reuters have also suffered reply-all incidents, but these incidents are nothing compared to a test message sent to UK’s National Health Service’s 1.2 million members, which created a deluge of emails so big that it crashed the system.

“Regarding NC5760131” wasn’t my first involuntary ride on a reply-all train. Not long before that email thread clogged my inbox, I found myself copied on an email thread about Kay’s hip surgery. I still don’t know who Kay is, but it seemed that her surgery had gone well, and the other 28 people on the thread were eager to congratulate her. I would have just deleted these emails and set up a filter to send them directly to spam, but once I started reading these notes, I couldn’t stop.

Over the course of Kay’s long email thread, I listened to a member of the group agonize over whether to return home (wherever that was) after a stint in Australia. I also received news of Tom’s tragic and untimely death. I read heart-felt memories about Tom and his friends, and it felt something like dropping into a soap opera a few episodes into season two. Eventually I surmised that this group of women had been high school classmates. I couldn’t bear to tell them that they had accidentally invited a voyeur into their midst. But I also knew that asking them to take me off their list was likely to just spark even more emails.

Which gets me to my Ann Landers question. What do you do when someone erroneously copies you on an email thread? The answer is simple. Don’t engage. A concise New York Times Q&A from 2016 was published with the headline “When I’m Mistakenly Put on an Email Chain, Should I Hit ‘Reply All’ Asking to Be Removed?” The one word answer? No.

It’s not the content of the email (in most cases) that makes a reply-all thread so annoying, it’s that it exists at all. Which is why replying only amplifies the awfulness. The best thing you can do in response to a reply-all thread is nothing. Let the damn thing die.

If only people would. Consider the NC5760131 thread. I put 136 of the emails (the ones that my spam filter didn’t eat) into a spreadsheet to analyze how the thread played out.

The first replies were earnest. “I think you added me to this email thread by mistake,” someone wrote. Within minutes, a new meme emerged. “Sorry, wrong [David or Karen or Chris]” replied some of the first responders. (“Wrong [insert name here]” became an ongoing joke as the thread expanded.)

Here’s my rough count of the overall responses. (They add up to a few more than 136, because some replies fell into multiple categories.)

48 jokes about the thread

31 requests to unsubscribe from the email chain

19 replies reveling in the absurdity of the reply-all thread

17 emails explaining the problem (“I think it’s obvious we were all accidentally attached to the email”)

14 replies saying “you’ve got the wrong [insert name here]”

10 photo memes (for instance, a photo of Michael Jackson eating popcorn with the words “I just came here to read the comments.”)

8 instructions: here’s what to do and how to stop replying to all. (“Please don’t reply all,” one person wrote, adding a long, detailed explanation.)

6 desperate attempts to make the emails stop, with exclamation points, all caps or other cries for help (STOP REPLYING ALL!!!, one person wrote.)

As you can see, the jokes outnumbered the earnest replies, and this was especially true as time went on and the LOL replies eclipsed the serious ones. Early in the thread, which lasted less than two hours, someone sent this plea:

PLEASE…it was a mistake…there are thousands of people on this email by accident…PLEASE don’t everyone reply all…let’s end the madness now before it starts!!

I chuckled when I read that. How naive to believe that such madness can be stopped. Once something’s on the internet, it takes on a life of its own. As the NC5760131 emails continued, they became more and more light-hearted. “I just wanted to inform the group that a hot dog is 100% a sandwich,” wrote one guy. Of course there were GIFs, and it was probably inevitable that someone posted a photo of The Dress. Sub-threads developed, with people making pitches for their favorite sports team (“Let’s go Mets!”) and ridiculous self-promotion (“Now would be a great time for all of you to take advantage of ESPN The Magazines discount for employees, friends and family.”) One guy even attached his resume, perhaps hoping to upgrade his job.

The thread eventually ended when someone from corporate intervened to block the thread. But don’t tell that to the guy who sent the last reply. His earnest note explained what was happening and asked “Please use this tool (email) in a responsible way.” He probably thinks it worked.

___

This post first ran on April 25, 2018.

Music in the Air

I had a conversation with an owl the other night. It was a barred owl, a pretty common species in the woods around our cabin in central Virginia. The bird got going early—well before dusk—and I happened to be outside with my native wooden flute (purchased from this lovely flutemaker in Canada), so I found similar notes and replied in the same pattern. There was a pause while cicadas and crickets took a turn. Then, the owl again. Four quick hoots, repeated twice, the final one dropping off into a guttural drag. I waited a few beats, lets the insects hum some more, then played again, the eight notes. Seconds passed. Then, the owl.

Barred owls aren’t just one-note birds: They have a variety of calls, more than a dozen by some counts, including one that you’d swear came from a monkey. But this was the one people like to say sounds like “Who cooks for you? Who cooks for you all?” (I’m not sold on that comparison, but it endures.)

It’s very possible, likely, even, that my flute playing had nothing to do with the owl’s decision to keep hooting. In my experience these owls will repeat the sequence at least a few times over a couple of minutes, regardless of any back talk. But I like to think we were conversing. There’s something magical about hearing a wild animal respond to you the way he would to his own kind, as if what you said was meaningful enough in his language to warrant a reply.

If barred owls weren’t so vocal, I wouldn’t know for sure they were around. Only once did I spy one, barely, as I pointed my flashlight beam into the big oak where a call seemed to be coming from. It was fully dark, but I glimpsed the bird’s eyeshine before he swooped toward me and then away, over my head. (A little anatomy: An owl’s eyes are super reflective, having an extra layer called the tapetum lucidum that snags light passing through the retina and bounces it back to what are already very sensitive rods.) The swoop was almost silent; I felt it more than heard it. Which is the owl’s way: The structure and texture of the wing feathers lets them funnel air very quietly by breaking up the turbulence that would otherwise whoosh.

But it was the calls moving through the air more than the bird’s anatomy that interested me that night. I thought about how the animal’s vocalizations in a sense fill a niche much as the physical animal does. It’s a more temporary residency, but still. I had the same notion some months before while lying in my tent in a rainforest in Borneo. I was listening, on my first night there, to the delightfully unfamiliar calls of wild things coming awake just before dawn. As cricket chirps were topped by a bird’s song that gave way to monkey chatter, I envisioned the soundscape in 3D with each unique noise—with its own pitch and volume and frequency—rushing in to inhabit an empty spot, standing tall to make itself known—ta da!–and then vacating just as quickly. Picture Tom Cruise in Minority Report flinging bits of data around in space with his finger…sliding this bit over, that one up, another one off screen, a new one in to replace it. That’s sort of how I saw it.

So, I think of animals as competing not just for a physical niche but for an aural one as well—a slot in the soundspace not yet taken that they can fill with chatter and alarms and music and be heard despite the din. It’s another way to make oneself known in a crowd. The variety makes it all possible: An elephant sending low-frequency rumbles through the Earth reaches her intended even as lions roar and cicadas scream. Like a lioness intent on spotting the weakest gazelle in the herd, an animal can hear a familiar voice and a known language rising above all others.

I don’t know that this is a terribly profound notion, but conversing with the owl, I realized that my flute toots were taking up one tiny pocket of aural space, filling that sound niche just for a moment, then flitting offscreen, leaving that spot vacant for the owl’s reply. Profound or no, it was kind of a neat way to think about it.

–Photo by Joshua J. Cotten on Unsplash

Mentally Vacationing In Lower Summer

Icelandic beach.

An Icelandic beach, which I did not visit this summer.

Summer is not over, officially, just yet; I know, it’s past Labor Day, but it is still Lower Summer* here and I am not ready. So although it is not gone, I am already mourning its end, especially the things I did not do, and the stone fruit I did not eat. (At least my daughters had more than they could bear.)

I have mostly been feeling like I did not travel as much as I would have liked this summer. I didn’t plan ahead; I had insufficient child care to do anything in a timely fashion, as always; and to be honest, my younger child is at a difficult age for travel. She loves airplanes, but really does not enjoy being inside of one.

I was a little envious when I saw photos from friends and colleagues who traveled to places like France and Japan for their honeymoons. I felt jealous when a high school friend shared photos of her visit to Iceland. I was a little disappointed that we didn’t we go somewhere equally cool and ambitious.

It’s not that I was trying to keep up with the Joneses or the whoevers. It was that these photos reminded me of what I love about long-distance travel, and traveling with my kids, as annoying as it can be logistically. Travel, especially international travel, drags you outside yourself, gives you a new perspective, forces you to be more aware of your surroundings. Unfamiliarity breeds admiration, even acclamation. Getting around in unfamiliar surroundings requires so much focus that you simply notice more. You appreciate more. You take it all in. I felt like I didn’t get enough of this, and worse, I was lazily depriving my kids of the singular joy of new experiences.

Over Labor Day weekend, I decided we needed to at least squeeze in a camping trip. My 2-year-old, the one who is not a good flier, was beyond excited.

When we arrived, she ran through the forest with her sister, who delighted in helping her look for lichen on the north-facing trunks of the pines. She scooped up fistfuls of gravel and called them “baby rocks.” She took me by the hand, walked through a stand of firs, and insisted that I “yook, yook at dis!” She said “hi” to the trees. She acclaimed every pine cone, every boulder, every fuzzy patch of moss.

I thought about one of my favorite books, recommended to me by one of my favorite friends: “Pilgrim at Tinker Creek,” by Annie Dillard. I loved this book’s fever-dream-like descriptions of otherwise everyday things, like a praying mantis egg, fish in a creek, a tree lit by the sun. I love how Dillard imbues mundane objects with a rapturous, almost holy aura. Without intending it, this is what my toddler was doing, too. Acclamation of the mundane is perhaps a toddler’s greatest skill. The phrase “childlike wonder” is a cliche for a reason.

Watching her watch the world was not unlike traveling to a foreign land. Everything is new to my toddler. Every bit of language is unfamiliar, every landscape is fresh, in the same way that traveling to other countries feels invigorating to me.

It started raining when I was writing this. Fall, my least favorite season, is imminent. It might really be here already. Looking back on last week’s camping trip, I feel better about my decision to avoid more than one airplane trip. The undiscovered country of a toddler’s world was enough for one summer.

*The poet and essayist Hanif Abdurraquib called September “Lower Summer” in a recent Instagram post and I will not soon forget this extremely apt phrase.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons image of a black sand beach in Iceland, where I did not go this summer.

Window: White Pine

Photograph of a chickadee on a slender branch of white pine.

It’s been a little while since I shared some bummer bird poetry. This one has the marvelous distinction of having been broadcast into a dark Scottish forest. My other poems are still a little jealous.

Window: White Pine

I.

Chaos in
the predawn dark—
starlings scream

II.

Robbing the open
pinecone, rewarded again
and again—chickadee

III.

The jay’s alarm—
Stranger! Stranger! Stranger!—
swallowed by the wind

IV.

Streetlight caught
in the raindrops caught in the
orb weaver’s web

V.

The owl arrives
soundlessly. The night
holds its breath.

VI.

i haven’t been outside since it happened

*

Photograph: Tyler Jamieson via Unsplash. This poem was previously published in SPROUT: The Nature of Cities and, as mentioned, read to the trees.

Why We Went Back


Returning to this creek was my stepdad’s idea. At 78, he wanted to try it again, but do it right this time. Twenty-some years ago, when we first hiked this mostly untrailed alpine canyon in Colorado, we planned it as a day trip with a car at either end for a shuttle. My mom was along. The canyon fell through limestone buttresses, the floor roaring where the creek jumped over boulders and falls. We didn’t make it out that day like we planned. The route proved too much and we huddled in beds of leaves through the night wearing everything we had, our campfire reduced to smoke, too damp to keep it going. The next day, groggy and with leaves in our hair, we reached our car. 

This summer, we returned with backpacks and proper gear. Three nights out would be a planned bivouac, plenty of time we thought. My mother wisely said no to this trip.

My stepdad and I climbed over fallen trees, mired for hours in labyrinths of beaver dams and their many sloughs, and he kept asking if this was the same creek. A time or two I wondered if we’d strayed into the wrong drainage, though we recognized larger features, chalky gray sheaves of limestone rising up either side of a trout stream, water running over stones of many colors. We didn’t have pictures from that first trip. We might not have taken any, too busy trying to make miles, jumping down waterfalls, our skin stinging with nettle. Now we wished we had because the route looked nothing like it did, at least not how we remembered it.

How much do you remember about twenty years ago? Who were you? In the span of a human life, it’s a good chunk. In the span of the Earth’s life, it’s less than nothing, but so much can happen.

Last time we’d walked right down the middle, calf-deep in chilled mountain water. This time we couldn’t get ten or twenty feet without nearly twisting an ankle in the creek. The bed had been so ruptured by floods that every cobble and rock was free, not at all armored by consistent flows.

My stepdad is a geologist. His go-to quote is by author Will Durant, “Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.” In the few decades we’ve known each other, we’ve backpacked into 30-million year old calderas ringed with castles of volcanic tuff, and endless domes, arches, and grabens in Four Corners sandstones. We’ve exhausted each other asking questions about the land, theorizing and explaining the way faults intersect or how gypsum crystals craze between rocks. Now we were exhausting ourselves in avalanche chutes choked with snapped and bent-over aspen trees, trying to get around falls in the creek we couldn’t walk. If there’d ever been a trail, it was long gone.

The first few miles of the canyon had originally been the easiest, and this time took all day. New waterfalls and deep pools had formed from old, big conifers fallen into the path and boulders the size of kitchens that we swore had not been here before. A big fire had ripped through the surrounding watershed and the floods that followed were punishing, stream banks undermined, drawing down landslides. We were seeing the tick-tock of geomorphology, the action of the Earth up close.

I can scarcely account for what else has changed in these two decades. We are older, for one, and I didn’t have children back then. He wasn’t a grandfather. I was a newlywed then and now I’m married to someone else. I live a hundred miles from where I started, and have moved a number of times between here and there. My beard wasn’t completely white and now it is. Aren’t we all landscapes in this way, prone to deposition and erosion, taken apart and put back together?

When the canyon closed more tightly at the end of the day, I told him I felt dubious. The rough corridor did not seem familiar. This we remembered as being the hardest stretch, the one that forced us to bivouac that chilly night. Now it looked undoable, jammed with short, complicated waterfalls dropping one after the next around the bend and out of sight. We’d need rope to get through rougher spots with no place to walk around. I feared search and rescue would be involved.

This wasn’t just the twenty years on us; the place had actually changed. I said we shouldn’t do this, we needed to turn back. He could have been crestfallen, but he seemed resolved. He said this was his last try, and I sure thought about saying damn the torpedoes, hell or high water, let’s plunge in! What better place to perish?

We dropped a camp and slept on it.

I’ve always been the risky one in the family. I’ve gotten my stepdad into perilous circumstances in wild places on multiple continents, and we’ve made it out huffing and puffing. The point is what you see when you’re there. It’s worth the sweat. This must be part of me that changed. Our lives have a different value, or maybe it’s wisdom. In the morning, we packed up headed back the way we came.


Phot by cc