The Marshmallow Test is Wrong and Bad

I have a new mantra. Live your life, kids. Sure, have the chocolate muffin for breakfast. Wear the nice shoes on the playground. Use the fine china. Eat the marshmallow. Life is short. You might not get another marshmallow, despite what people tell you, so enjoy what you have while it lasts.

My older daughter has a favorite washcloth, a favorite shirt, a favorite pair of leggings, a favorite pair of shoes, a favorite water bottle — you get the idea. The minute these items are clean and available, they are back in use. I know, because I do all the laundry, and sometimes I do it early so she will have renewed access to her favorite stuff. 

I also have a favorite shirt, pair of boots, ice cream flavor, tea mug, tea type — you get the idea. I know, because I usually save them for last. I make myself wear the scratchy fleece or the pinchy boots first, and drink the tea I don’t like, because … I don’t really know why. Because it will even things out, or something? I should suffer first to enjoy the good stuff later? I want to save my favorite things to make them last longer. But this inevitably means they don’t get used as often. 

I don’t know how this happened. But I now think my daughter is onto something, and that I’m doing it wrong. (This is often the case.) I thought about one of the most famous examples of delayed gratification, the so-called marshmallow test.

This was a simple test designed to examine how and at what age kids learn the concept of delayed gratification. In its most basic outlines, kids between the ages of 4 and 6 were offered a marshmallow in a research setting, and told they could either eat it now and call it good, or wait to eat it for 15 minutes and get a bonus second marshmallow. The test was meant to understand the age and maturity level at which kids figure out that waiting is okay, maybe even better, despite how hard it can be. But the test truly became famous after the researchers revisited these same kids years later. They apparently found a correlation between the kids’ ability to wait for the second marshmallow and their relative success in adulthood. For a very thorough breakdown, read this Vox article

But in 2018, psychologists revisited the famous study and found there was no real correlation. Turns out that a kindergartener’s ability to delay her own satisfaction can’t actually predict her success in adulthood. Rather, there are far more pervasive, frustrating forces at play—for instance, the successful kids in the original study all had wealthy, successful parents.

I feel like this is obvious, especially in retrospect, but I also feel like the very notion of delayed gratification is … well, I’ll just say it. It’s dumb. I don’t like it or the notion that it’s something we should aspire to. The marshmallow test’s supposed correlation to excellence is toxic, but it’s also sometimes just the wrong way to live.

Screw delaying gratification. Seize the day! A bird in hand is worth two in the bush. Carpe diem. YOLO. Tempus fugit! Burn the candle.

Use your favorite washcloth. Wear the fuzzier, nicer fleece. Who knows how many times you’ll get to use it at all, anyway? Why wait for happiness to come later, when your very life is happening before you, and you don’t even know how long it will be? 

Life is short, babies. Eat the first marshmallow you are offered. Eat it immediately, and have no regrets. 

image: Wikimedia Commons

The People of LWON Are, In Spite of Everything, Grateful

HELEN: I’m thankful for all the new skills I’ve developed in the last 2.5 years. That’s how I’ve kept myself sane in pandemic times. And I’m using them – I’m trying to make a bunch of Christmas tree ornaments with my quilting and embroidery skills by the first weekend in December, for example, and I will be eating pizza (baking skills) tonight. This feels pretty underwhelming for a Thanksgiving post, but I’m the first one to write anything in here so now everything everybody else writes will sound better. You’re welcome, People of LWON! 

ANN:  Where to even start? Even though I’m still too cautious to go out much, I’m grateful to the people who keep inviting me; I think of them as superior beings looking kindly upon my trembly self, knowing that one day my baby steps will take me to their houses, to restaurants with them.  In fact, I’m grateful for the baby-steps phenomenon, the tiny slow easy things that do end up in a future I wouldn’t have thought I could handle.  

JANE: In no particular order: my air purifier, tater tots, karaoke, Lorde’s Solar Power, whoever invented bicycles, friends old and new, a body that can carry me the places I want to go, the sun, every person who has fought to make this world a slightly better place. 

RICHARD: Can we call this autumn, punningly, the Fall of the Autocrat? Bolsonaro, Putin, Musk, Trump. I admit, I’m writing this paragraph three days after the election, and, I also admit, I’m writing it while nursing a Longboard lager at a bar in Hawaii with a view of mountains and the ocean, but if the present fortuitous civilization-spanning circumstances (and I’m not referring to my current louche lifestyle) change between now and the day this post goes live, then I—  

No, wait. I was going to say, “Then I reserve the right to retract this post.” But actually, I don’t want to reserve that right. I hereby cede it. Because even if the immediate cultural/political vibe winds up changing for the worse in the next two weeks, I will treasure this memory. Right now, right here–6:32:47 PM HST November 11, 2022; 21.96139N, 159.34871W–is an intersection of time and space for which I am, and will remain, thankful.

Continue reading

consider the toothpaste

I wrote this in 2021 and originally published it in my newsletter. Almost two years later, I am still thinking about it, so please, if you know Crest’s copywriters, please reach out.

For unobservant people (me), product labels are background noise. I don’t pay much attention to the text on a package of toilet paper or what’s written on the various boxes and cans I bring home from the grocery store, though I do think about this can of peas all the time. My partner, on the other hand, reads everything closely. If there’s anything on the dining table while we’re having a meal — a flier, the wrapper around takeout chopsticks — he’ll reflexively read it. So it did not surprise me at all when he showed me the text on our toothpaste tube.

“What does this even mean?” he asked with incredulity, pointing at a phrase highlighted in its own little white box: “Protects against areas dentists check most.”

Continue reading

“A year later, I was still thinking about this octopus.” A Conversation with Sabrina Imbler (Part I)

A deep blue underwater photograph of an upside-down jelly, its tentacles streaming upward

After a long, miserable summer of illness, I’m back, and I’ve got something extra-marvelous to share: an interview with Sabrina Imbler (they/them), a fellow poet/essayist/science writer and the author of the forthcoming collection HOW FAR THE LIGHT REACHES: A Life in Ten Sea Creatures. Our conversation about writing, publishing, and (what else?) marine invertebrates was so rich that it can’t be contained in a single post, so stay tuned for an absolute banger of a Part II next month. NOTE: This interview has been edited for clarity and length.

Continue reading

A Shape in the Woods

This concerns the burned out hulk of a ponderosa pine that bears have taken an interest in, sculpted, really. I recently saw this smoldered-black tree on a backpack with two friends in Western Colorado. The walk took four days with no human trails to speak of, so when we arrived, we were well away from human presence in a purely animal landscape.

One of the friends had found it weeks earlier, saying he considers this one of the most important finds of his life. It is a mysterious meeting place for bears. When I saw it from a hundred feet away, I thought the object was a big bear in the woods. A large tree will burn down in a wildfire and leave a hooded black stump that can be mistaken for a large animal. Through lines of standing, live ponderosas, catching it out of the side of my eye, it seemed to be standing on its hind legs, peering through the trees.

This had been a large ponderosa pine, at the peak of its life thirty or forty years ago. For whatever reason, it had grown at a slight angle, and a fire burned it down to about ten feet of trunk, the base smoldering into a stiletto. It looks like a half-ton charred ballerina standing on a single leg. At the top, on what appears to be a head, stands a pair of uncanny protuberances, not unlike the raised ears of a black bear, making it not a ballerina, but ursine, bulky in the chest, heads taller than any living bear. 

You can tell something has been happening around this charred shell. A halo of pine needle duff has been pummeled flat by the weight of many bears over time. This has long been a focus of ursine attention. It stands like their shrine, like nothing the three of us had ever seen in the wild.

Continue reading

When society imitates fiction

A snake oil salesman and some hedge funds partner up to pimp the latest ‘synthetic biology’ scam—as phantom revenue, a hocus-pocus business model, rampant related-party games, and a decade of colossal failure get shoveled into yet another garbage SPAC. Ginkgo Bioworks is a colossal scam, a Frankenstein mash-up of the worst frauds of the last 20 years.

So begins a 2021 short-seller’s report, representative in style of the literary form.

This year I’ve been reading a fair number of ‘short reports’, a type of inflammatory, investigative presentation aimed at convincing other investors to dump a stock. Short sellers play an important ecological role in the public markets, clearing away excess valuations that otherwise build into bubbles. If one couldn’t sell short, investors could only speculate in one direction—upward. But like all scavengers, activist short sellers are roundly loathed.

The short reports I’ve been reading have done nothing to dispel this grimy reputation. There is a kind of disdain for their victim, a schadenfreude in the suggestion that they will not only bring down a company but gain from its downfall, too. But there is something else in the literary style. Each time, I sense I should be wearing a fedora. The language is so reminiscent of noir detective fiction that my surroundings transmogriphy into a dimly-lit bar, a lone saxophone playing at the edges while, as I read, my inner voice takes on a transatlantic accent.

Continue reading

In the Pocket

Beethoven’s sketches for String Quartet in C sharp minor, op. 131.

My grandmother used to take me to master classes at the Music Academy of the West in Santa Barbara, where young musicians from all over the world came to train. After buying our $10 tickets, we’d stand in the line of mostly senior citizens waiting for the doors to open. I’d hold her hand and rest my head on her shoulder, inhaling her Obsession perfume.

Nana wasn’t allowed to listen to music growing up, so as an adult she learned to play cello and taught her children and grandchildren to love classical music and jazz. We usually sat in the first or second row, close enough to hear the students breathing and their shoes squeaking. Barely-out-of-college opera singers wiped their sweaty hands on their pants and pianists dropped their sheet music. Then the teacher would arrive, the students would pull themselves together, and they’d get to work. 

The students were very, very good. But as we listened, their instructors made small adjustments that transformed their performances from good to something shiver-worthy, perfect. 

Continue reading

100 Days, 1 Dress

woman dancing in pink dress

This weekend I could not motivate to write a blog post from thin air, so I asked Our Cameron to interview me instead. Here we are.

So I saw a photo on Instagram of you wearing a pink(?!) dress. And then you said that you had worn that dress for 100 days. Wow! And what’s the deal?

I did! 100 days in a row! 

The deal is that there’s this company called Wool& that has a very clever marketing thing: If you wear one of their dresses for 100 days, they’ll give you a $100 gift certificate. Their dresses cost over $100 each so the economics of this aren’t really the point – I’ll leave the math to you. But a friend of mine was doing the company’s 30-day challenge (same deal, for a $30 gift certificate) and I thought…well, that sounds fun. So I went for it, and dove right in to the 100 days.

Their clothes are made out of wool blends, and the point of the challenge is that wool doesn’t really get stinky. At the beginning I washed it every night in the sink but by the end of the 100 days I’d go for a week or two without even thinking about washing it. It just didn’t smell bad.

Ok, so I confess, I also looked at this (had I known you were doing this, I might have been able to do it in solidarity!). But I couldn’t figure out what dress I would actually wear for 30 days. I was thinking small. How did you pick? 

It wasn’t a very sophisticated thought process. It was May in Washington, D.C., which meant I was going to be wearing it all summer, so I wanted short-sleeved or sleeveless. I obviously wanted pockets. And then one of the sleeveless dresses came in pink. I did consider getting it in a subtler color, like navy, but then I remembered that I love pink and I would probably enjoy wearing it every day. I was right!

And so wearing the same dress over and over is not too stinky–but otherwise, what’s it like to wear the same dress for 100 days? 

Continue reading