My Daughter and the Not-Perfect Bunny

You woke up screaming in the middle of the night, frantic. You held up your bunny, a floppy square of pink blanket attached to a long-eared rabbit head. “This bunny is not perfect,” you wailed.

I knew what you meant. This bunny, one of three identical bunnies, is the oldest, the most worn. His fur is a little less pink than it used to be, a little less soft. He’s clean, but the whites of his ears have grown dingy.

So, yeah, this bunny is not perfect. This bunny was loved — drug across the playground, stuffed into the trunk of your trike, abandoned briefly on the floor of the bar where your favorite musician sings the song about a peanut getting hit by a train. This bunny was loved, and with love he got used. That should make him more appealing, not less.

Continue reading

Redux: Goodbye to the Friend I Never Met

I wrote this piece a year ago at the end of an exhausting story about the end of a species. I was angry and despondent. I wish I could say that a year has changed my perspective. Scientists have spotted a surprising six individuals more during their expedition to the Upper Gulf this year. But nothing substantive has changed in the politics of the region and my hopes are dim. 
Saturday was the day I finally gave up. The last hope for the vaquita marina, the world’s smallest and most endangered cetacean, is gone. On Saturday, biologists working in the Upper Gulf of California announced that the latest animal they had captured in an effort to save the species had died in captivity.

For the first half of 2017, I was knee deep in a story I’ve been following since I got to Mexico six years ago. In summary, an animal that had found itself on the wrong side of rampant poaching practices is all but wiped out and the last option is a Hail Mary plan to round them up into captive pens and hold them until such time as humans stop sucking at ocean stewardship. (For a full review of the vaquita’s tragic tale, I really encourage you to read the story.)

But there was always a problem with this strategy – no one had ever tried to catch one before. It was possible they wouldn’t go quietly into pens.

“If captivity fails, then, well, we tried,” NOAA biologist Barbara Taylor told me in the spring. “It’s game over.”

After Saturday, I think it’s game over. The vaquita doesn’t do captivity. The first animal caught by biologists got so stressed out that it had to be released. The second died within hours. We have now officially done more harm than good in our attempts to save the vaquita. In fact, this whole effort has been one long lesson in throwing the porpoise out with the bathwater. From the beginning, it feels like we’ve tried to help the vaquita with the best of intentions and have only made things worse.

Continue reading

Redux: An interview with David Grinspoon, author of Earth in Human Hands

David Grinspoon is a comparative planetologist and an astrobiologist. He’s also a big book nerd, and his love for both fiction and nonfiction are proudly on display in his own book, Earth In Human Hands: Shaping Our Planet’s Future. The book was recently featured in an ongoing series on “Resistance Reading” selected by authors and published by Mother Jones. Author Jesmyn Ward picked it as part of her list. In her words, “this book provides a sobering exploration of how human beings have affected the climate of our planet, but also gives us reason to hope in the end. We need that now.”

I agree. Here’s an interview with Grinspoon that originally ran in March of 2017.

Continue reading

There are Two Kinds of People: Those Who Make Their Beds and Those Who Don’t

I was at the pharmacy the other day, waiting for my flu shot, when I spotted a book called Make Your Bed: Little Things That Can Change Your Life…And Maybe the World. It was written by a retired U.S. Navy Admiral. In his tongue in cheek synopsis of the book at the Guardian, John Crace explains that the admiral learned about the importance of bed-making during Naval SEAL training camp:

Every morning, we would have to make our beds. If the task wasn’t done properly, we would be sent on a 10-mile run. Making my bed taught me the importance of getting my day off to a good start. Years later, when we finally captured Saddam Hussein in Iraq, I was intrigued to notice that he had never made his bed. It’s that kind of laziness that can lead to the downfall of any dictator.

Which is exactly the kind of thing that a bed-maker would say. As if folding sheets and positioning pillows could impose order and predictability on a chaotic, uncertain world.

There are two kinds of people in this world: those who get up every morning and make their beds, and the people who don’t bother. In case it’s not obvious yet, I’m one of the latter.

It didn’t occur to me that bed-making was such a telling detail about a person until I noticed that my friend Rosemerry’s bed is always perfectly made. Continue reading

On Food Pills And Legacy

What if instead of eating three meals each day (plus snacks, if you’re me) we just popped pills and moved along with our lives. Food pills were once a staple of science fiction, from Dr. Who to Star Trek to the Jetsons, and I recently did an episode of my podcast Flash Forward about the dream of replacing food with capsules. Turns out, food pills are basically impossible to achieve, but the continued obsession with them says a lot about cultural neuroses.

You can listen to the episode for more about that (please do, this is a bald faced plug for my podcast) but one thing that struck me in researching the episode is the way that the history of food pills as a concept is told online. The woman who is almost always credited with the idea certainly didn’t come up with it, nor did she care about it all that much at all. Her story is far more interesting, in fact, and the fact that her name is now synonymous with food pills rather than her actual work is a fascinating (if depressing) case study in how history is repeated and warped online.

Continue reading

Here I Am

I’m standing in my underwear and socks, gripping a rolled-up magazine that is shredded at the end from my violent battle with the flies. I’ve killed a dozen or more of them this Wednesday morning, but they just keep alighting as if there is some source—a pile of dog shit, a rotting corpse—hidden just there, under the newspapers slouched in the corner, or here, behind the overstuffed laundry basket on the sofa. It occurs to me in passing that if such a source is that close by, I have a bigger problem than flies. Still, I continue wielding the torn New Yorker—three weeks old, 1/3 read (mostly the cartoons)—beating it, mostly fruitlessly, against the sunny countertops as the flies lift off with an irritating buzz. (Fuck you, too, flies.)

I’m in my underwear because of the hot flashes. There are certain ramifications to reaching the middle ages, one of them being the handing off of one’s hormones to a cruel sorcerer who gleefully pinches off the estrogen drip at his whim.

I’m in my socks because hot flashes are usually quick things, and after one ends I’m suddenly freezing. Whatever was sweating will be, next, chilled. I have little control over the internal thermostat, but keeping the feet wrapped gives me an ounce of control over this phase of misery. Small victories.

Yes, this is who I am right now.

Ping! An email has arrived. I abandon my murderous work and click. The note is from a high school student out West somewhere. She informs me that over the last few weeks she’s been reading all my pieces—part of an assignment to follow a favorite journalist. To her I am a hero, a skilled woman writer tapping into adventure and living her passion, a shiny thing in darkness. She wants to know more about me, how I got to do what I do, how I’ve managed to become this person she so admires and how she might follow in my successful footsteps.

And I have to laugh at her timing, the scene before her if, horror of horrors, she could see me: The me in the underwear with the flies and the hot flashes, the me who can’t get organized or inspired, the me with the puffy eyes after another night of stress-waking. The me she’s envisioning is the confident one from the back of a book—a woman I haven’t seen in months–the brushed and smiling Author with a long list of ideas and a clear road of success starting way back when and rushing into the future. That’s what most people expect who don’t know me in person, and even some who do.

But, you see, I’ve been away from LWON for some months and not because I was hunched over a book manuscript or jetting around the world chasing elephants or iguanas. The truth is less glamorous: This writer, as happens to most in this field, has hit a wall.

There are plenty of possible reasons, but one is simply that the field is packed tighter with freelancers than ever; staying ahead of the rest takes a certain grit and an even flow, not a slow drip, of original ideas. Meanwhile, some of us tire of having to sell ourselves over and over. Some of us are weary of slim paychecks and forgotten invoices. Some of us are tired of editors who forget to tell you what you did right before launching into all the wrongs. (Many do remember to compliment. But some don’t.) We scrabble for scraps. Our souls are sucked dry.

I wouldn’t call this writers’ block. A block is something that can be shattered with the swing of a sledgehammer, or slid out of the way in three heaves by a handful of friends on a Saturday afternoon (with the promise of pizza and beer).

Remember Han Solo frozen, grimacing, in the wall of carbonite?

Actually, let’s go bigger. Game of Thrones. That ice monument looming over the end of civilization—that’s the wall in this scenario. It’s massive and bone-chilling, shored up with horrendous news headlines like rebar in concrete. And the fact is, when one is defined by what one does as many of us writers tend to be, a hard stop to creativity is especially devastating.

I’ve been thinking a lot about identity as a result of this hit to mine, why some of us can’t see ourselves outside of our careers. It may be especially hard if we have a public face, some kind of success that has defined us for others. The successful writer is what when not being successful and not writing?

We are encouraged to find an identity. And that should be a good thing. Yet think of how identity has divided us. One People, yes, but so, so many ways to pull away from fellow humans these days. Isn’t it from labels that prejudice is born? While many of us speak of unity and acceptance, we continue to splinter into ever smaller groups and to stand up and scream that we, of that group, deserve special attention. Ultimately walls go up between our camps. So many walls. So much anger on either side of those walls. Disgust, even.

Evolutionarily, feeling disgust toward “other” may have once served us, keeping foreign pathogens from reaching new hosts. But morally, disgust at “other” serves no one. And yet.

And yet we wave our own flags facing off with those waving different flags. Faith, color, sex, blue versus red, meat or no meat (“cruelty or cruelty free?”), sexual preference, nationality, financial status…which Star Wars character are you, what decade are you, which European castle or dog breed are you. Even in entertainment we look for a club to join. We’ve become so “identified with,” so black and white even as we profess the desire for gray, for equality and blindness toward our differences.

Perhaps it’s a stretch, but in a way, I’ve decided, this writer who sees herself as defined by her writing—the successes and, mostly, the failures—has separated herself from all the other things she is as a human, and is, in a sense, fighting against herself. If I’m not writing, I’m scared that I’ve lost all that is important about me. What am I if not a writer? Something “not good enough.” Something to be ashamed of. Something to sneer at–a woman lost and unhinged who dreams of slinging hay for farm animals. I denounce my other selves for being less than. I forget to see the whole.

I’ve been waving my writer flag so high that I’ve lost sight of the beauty of the other flags I carry. Especially that of the simple human being just trying to make her way in the world, focused on family and health and doing right by others, and on searching for whatever beauty can still be coaxed from this world. That’s a flag we can all carry together.

I’ll admit to being comforted by this truth about writers: We tend to circle back to writing over and over. It won’t let us go, and we wouldn’t know what else to do if it did. I fantasize about different kind of job, maybe watering plants or making donuts or tending goats (really, I want to tend goats), but mostly because I know a different kind of job would give me new experiences and, as a result, something new to write about. So that part of me will, ultimately, rise to the top on its own. That has to be good enough.

So, here I am, still in my socks (one has a hole, I’ve noticed), making some slow headway toward the top of the wall, wielding my fly swatter in defense. I’m searching for a cool breeze. I’m wandering in the woods (not pitching stories, not writing a book proposal), looking for meaning in a world that’s become stunningly divided and divisive. I’m trying hard to embrace the parts of me that aren’t the writer and let them breathe un-panicked breaths until the writer returns.

My promise to the young woman who wrote to me is that the confident, competent writer in me isn’t gone forever. It’s a promise to myself as well. But I’m seeking ways to broaden my identity rather than celebrating one part and chastising all others. And I’m looking out from in here at the splintered world and applying the same lesson. No one of us is just one thing. The mosaic is especially beautiful when woven together. The mosaic, woven together, is what matters.

—–
Photo by rawpixel on Unsplash

Fellowship #1: This Embedding Business

Jessa Gamble is embedded in an experimental evolution lab at the University of Ottawa.


What I cannot simulate, stepping into the daily life of a lab and its early career researchers, is the stress they feel. I do not, except vicariously, buzz with the manic tension of finalizing a five-year NSERC grant. I am not a post-doc clinging to the steep sides of a job selection pyramid, wondering whether I will summit Mount Tenure or slide off into the outside world, for which my training leaves me unprepared. The stakes just aren’t there for me.

Continue reading

Not About Voting But For the Love of God, Go Vote! Vote!

This post has nothing to do with voting.  I didn’t notice until I went to schedule it that it was on Voting Day.  Voting is more important than reading this. Please, if you like living in a democracy, go vote. 

But if you’ve already voted, then here you go:

When I was a kid, one suppertime around the table, my sister asked one of her questions.  She had good questions.  This one was, “why is music the only art that goes straight to your feelings?”  My father, who was the musical one, declined to answer; I don’t remember whether he said he didn’t know or just didn’t answer but the latter would have been like him.  I thought, “she’s made me feel dumb again, she’s always making me feel dumb, but that’s a really good question.”  I knew what she meant: the other arts evoke your emotions but music seems to get right in there and create them.  Music seems to happen interiorly.

Likewise but recently, I was getting a haircut from the salon’s owner.  She’s a woman of a certain age and a certain temperament, and the music that the 20-something receptionist had put on the sound system was getting on her nerves.  “Put some other music on,” she yelled across the room, but apparently she didn’t trust the receptionist’s taste so she said,  “Here, look out, I’m going to do it.”  And sure enough, a minute later a tenor singing Puccini billowed through the salon, and she came back to my hair.  “Turn it up,” she yelled again.  The receptionist apparently demurred.  “Turn it UP!” she yelled, and the tenor bloomed in passion.  She stepped away from me and stood in the middle of the salon to get some scope for her declaration.  “You don’t just listen to this music,” she yelled.  “You gotta BREATHE IT IN!”

Ok, so, interior.  How does that work?  I rummaged around in online psycho-neuro-type researches and found out that, of course, people have been thinking about the connection between music and emotion since the ancient Greeks.  “Music hath charms to soothe a savage breast,” and I know, it’s Congreve not the ancient Greeks, but the idea obviously has staying power.  Anyway.

Current science, from what I can tell, backs it.  Science plays music and measures peoples’ physical reactions – heart rate, skin conductance, muscle tension, blood pressure, goose bumps (piloerection, thank you) – and yes, people react physically to music.  Science asks people questions: does this music make you feel an emotion? what emotion? what about the music makes you feel this emotion? do other people hear the same music and feel the same emotion?  Then science makes charts of the obvious answers. Then science argues with itself about whether people are perceiving the emotion in the music or whether they’re actually feeling it inside themselves. So science goes farther and peers into your brain with various methods – really, science? PET scans using radioactive tracers to study music? surely over-enthusiastic? – and finds that the brain areas that light up with music are the same areas that handle emotion (but also many other things, right?).

None of this science is going to tell you anything you didn’t already know or couldn’t guess.  And besides, it’s not what my sister was asking.  She wanted to know why music seems to go straight inside you to your emotions, that is, why is its effect so direct?  Notice, she was implicitly comparing music with the other arts: painting and sculpture, literature, theater.   I think I’ve figured this out – it’s taken me decades but I haven’t worked on it full time.  I think it’s because all the other arts, even literature, are visual; you can see them, touch them, they exist outside you, they have an external reality.  Music, invisible and intangible, happens inside your head.

I think this answer is nice but obviously flawed.  I can tell the difference between music that’s coming out of the stereo — that is, external reality — and music that’s going around in my head.  But never mind, music is still more interior than the more visual arts and flawed argument or not, I’m sticking to it.

A quiet, cool, sunny Sunday afternoon, I was reading and not thinking about sickness and decline and the funeral service I’d been to.  On the stereo, a curlicuing soprano voice spiraled up to a high note and hung there, silvery and effortless, slipping into all the things I wasn’t thinking, sliding into my bones and resonating, condensing into a pinpoint of loss and grief.  I wasn’t listening to it but I still had to put down my book and stare out the window for a while, watch the deepening sunlight turn the brick houses across the street to a color you couldn’t paint, only feel.

_______

Estonian violinist and singer Maarja Nuut at Viljandi Folk Music Festival, photo by Vaido Otsar via Wikimedia Creative Commons.  For some reason, the photo reminds me of Rhiannon Giddens, though she’s much plainer and more down to earth and scary as hell.