Good Bones and Weltschmerz

This post originally ran August 16, 2018. But as COVID19 cases surge, hospitals reach capacity, and the long, dark winter descends, you can bet I’m again feeling the weltschmerz.

Two years ago, a poet named Maggie Smith wrote a poem called ‘Good Bones.’ I printed it out, and I find myself reading it over and over again. “The world is at least fifty percent terrible/and that’s a conservative estimate,” Smith writes.

Really conservative. Right now, I’d put the number closer to ninety percent. Nearly everything feels awful. I have a bad case of weltschmerz, a term I just learned that smashes together the German words for ‘world’ and ‘pain.’ According to Joachim Whaley, a German historian and linguist at the University of Cambridge, weltschmerz “is the sense both that one is personally inadequate and that one’s personal inadequacy reflects the inadequacy of the world generally.” He adds, “it is pain suffered simultaneously both in the world and at the state of the world, with the sense that the two are linked.”

Yes, that’s exactly how I feel. My personal failings represent the failings of humanity. And lordy are we failing hard.

Continue reading

The Death of a Star As Told to the Trees

Space is this abstract concept to lots of you. I know so many people, including so many writers, who could not care less about the subject. They are bored, at best, by everything that exists beyond the eggshell-thin layer of this planet’s atmosphere. The wild, kaleidoscopic kingdom of life on this world is enough for them. As much as I love living things, I will never understand this perspective.

Antipathy about space vs. SPACE!!1! is an old argument and it’s one I have held with friends for years, and so I don’t feel like re-litigating it. But allow me to enter into evidence, if you will, a new finding that should remind you of how space is not far at all, but near, and part of us all, and a force in all our lives.

Trees can absorb the shockwaves of supernovas, and record them for posterity. 

Continue reading

Hungry Birds

Anna’s Hummingbird in Pacifica, California. Photo by Rhododendrites/Wikimedia Commons

As the days get colder and darker, and the escalating pandemic keeps me homebound, I’m trying to make the most of what I can see through my windows. Last week I bought a beautiful vintage hummingbird feeder made from a blood-red glass bottle with fluted sides. I filled it with sugar water and hung it on my back porch, where I can see it from my desk. Within minutes, a hungry Anna’s hummingbird arrived, flashing emerald wings and a ruby gorget.  

The hummingbird is now my main entertainment during the workday, and a source of tortured fascination for Calliope, our strictly indoor cat. Calliope’s jaws chatter and her striped tail twitches as she watches the bird whizz to and fro, dipping its long bill into the feeder’s flower-shaped divots.

Continue reading

Looking Up

Cameron said the other day that she’s feeling a little bit low on perspective right now.

First of all: Me, too, Cameron. Me, too.

Secondly: For perspective, I recommend the sky. It’s always there, there’s often something happening in it, and the thing that is happening almost never relates to an election.

Here are some things I have seen in the sky in the last week.

  • Mars. It’s bright enough these days for me to find it without my glasses in city light pollution. Is that an official measure of brightness? It should be.
  • Vultures. Dozens of them, circling overhead. Also, I was in the backyard of a friend who is a serious birder and could teach me (masked, from a distance) how to tell the difference between black and turkey vultures when they’re far overhead. It has to do with where on the underside of their wings they have lighter-colored patches.
  • Two bald eagles. The same friend picked out the birds that weren’t vultures and also figured out what they were. Bald eagles look very different from vultures, even when they’re hundreds of feet up, silhouetted against the sky, but you have to take the time to look.
  • The absence of a helicopter. I keep hearing helicopters over my apartment and then, despite having windows on two sides of the building, not being able to find the actual helicopter in the sky. I assume the helicopters exist, and that they aren’t some kind of imaginary brain helicopter I’m inventing.
  • Cassiopeia. A high school teacher made us learn the circumpolar constellations and I’ve never stopped noticing that W in the sky.
  • A bunch of crows chasing a raven. This looked like a bunch of crow-shaped silhouettes, but one of them was huge and croaky, and the other crow-shaped silhouettes clearly hated it. (Ravens don’t often come to D.C. – this was about 100 miles from here, in West Virginia.)
  • A shooting star. Zip! Across a little stretch of sky, just to the left of Mars. I watched for a while, but it was the only one.

When you look back at Earth, everything is still more or less the same, but now you can remember that there’s a bird soaring, or dust burning up in the atmosphere, or that stars still exist.

Photo: Helen Fields

Redux: Whatever Trees

I’m a little bit low on perspective right now, so I’m checking back in with the trees for some resilience inspiration. This post first appeared in 2018.

There’s a quote I’ve seen attributed to Ram Dass about why we should turn people into trees. When we look at people (or ourselves), we judge. We compare. We criticize. But for trees, Ram Dass says, it’s different. “Some of them are bent, and some of them are straight, and some of them are evergreens, and some of them are whatever. And you look at the tree and you allow it. You appreciate it. You see why it is the way it is. You sort of understand that it didn’t get enough light, and so it turned that way.”

That’s what I look for, the whatever in trees. The more whatever the better. The wind-swept bristlecone pine that thrives in its gnarliness at the highest elevations. The rainbow eucalyptus, with colors you can see once the bark starts peeling off. The Moreton Bay Fig Tree next to the playground, which has huge roots and crannies that are equal to any climbing structure.

Last weekend it was Joshua trees. These spiky plants have few clusters of branches—some have none at all—leaving the ones they have to take on the burden of arms. They reach out, they point the way, they perform sun salutations. They shrug. The Mormons noticed: the story goes that 19th century pioneers gave the tree its name because of its resemblance to the biblical Joshua, extending his arms in prayer.

These evergreens look even more unusual against the backdrop of the Mojave Desert. Blue sky, sand-colored boulders, the craggy trees standing around, giving each other enough personal space to take in the view, for us to take them in. They have no tree rings; we guess at their ages based on their height.

Making more Joshua trees is a finely tuned affair. They must bloom—it doesn’t happen all the time, and may involve the precise combination of precipitation and a winter freeze. Then there is the yucca moth, essential to pollination. As a person, the Joshua tree would need to chart her basal temperature, calculate the ovulation window. Perhaps she would require scented candles. When she lit the candles, they might smell like rain.

Or maybe she wouldn’t need any of this when it came down to it. They can re-sprout after the main tree has been wiped out by fire or flood. They weather extreme heat and cold, months of drought and then a five-inch downpour. They can live for more than 150 years. Some may live far longer.

And so much about them is still unknown. Researchers writing in PLOS ONE thought that warmer climate may have caused a peak bloom of Joshua trees across its range in 2013, and found that increased temperatures did boost reproduction at the sites they studied. But the bloom was so widespread, with trees flowering in urban settings well outside their normal range, that the scientists think climate wasn’t the only thing that triggered the floral explosion.

It’s certainly easier to see both the forest and the trees here. Each one with its pincushion personality, the group of them united in their daily, yearly, decadal survival—maybe even communicating in a way we don’t yet see. It’s so much harder with people. I rarely notice the poor soil, the past deluges, the invisible messages in a language I don’t recognize. But there are the arms, doing what arms do, with so many fewer spikes. There is the whatever, making its daily attempt at survival. I’ll imagine the desert behind this mobile, two-legged tree so I can see it better.

*

Image by Christopher Michel, Flickr/Creative Commons license

The Lookout Cookbook

When, years from now, I reflect on the debacle that was 2020, I will remember it for COVID, of course, and for its possibly planet-saving election; but I will also recall it as the Year of the Fire Tower. Decommissioned fire lookout towers stipple ridgelines across the West, many of which can be rented for a $40 nightly fee — a sensational bargain, as long as you don’t mind carrying your water up fifty feet of rickety stairs and sleeping on a mattress strewn with mouseshit. Elise and I spent this summer bouncing up derelict dirt roads to towers with names like Cougar Peak and Gird Point and Yaak Mountain, seeking solace in sunsets and the stoic profile of the Northern Rockies. As I wrote recently for CNN: “Being surrounded by millions of years of rugged geology doesn’t diminish our present crisis, but it does offer a bit of deep context.”

I’ve come to love fire towers not only for their scenery, but for their history. Luminaries like Gary Snyder and Ed Abbey once scanned horizons for smoke; Jack Kerouac suffered an emotional meltdown during his summer at Desolation Peak. Traces of antiquity still survive at some towers: initials carved into cement foundations; lichen-encrusted cairns; the wondrous Osborne Firefinders that dominate the tiny cabins like supermassive stars. In one tower we unearthed a copy of the Fire Man’s Handbook, a 1966 manual whose wisdom included this pearl: “When lightning storm is near or overhead, observe the following safety rules: Stand on insulated glass-legged stool.”

If lightning didn’t kill twentieth-century lookouts, the food might do the job. Lookout cuisine was, by all accounts, abominable. Fire-watchers depended on the canned, the powdered, the non-perishable: anything that could be hauled in on a mule and preserved without refrigeration. One early cookbook advised lookouts to “purchase a half or a whole mutton from sheepherders in the vicinity of your station. To keep, hang up in a tree or some other high point at night, wrapped in canvas, or put in a burlap sack during the day and put between blankets and mattress of bed.” No wonder towers were often ransacked by bears.

Fire tower food was so notoriously terrible that it inspired a Colville National Forest lookout to pen the following bit of doggerel, in which FS stands for Forest Service: 

 I like FS biscuits;

think they’re mighty fine.

One rolled off the table

and killed a pal of mine.

I like FS coffee;

think it’s mighty fine.

Good for cuts and bruises

just like iodine.

I like FS corned beef;

it really is okay.

I fed it to the squirrels;

funerals are today.

Continue reading

The Great British Baking Show Versus the Election

It’s still Thursday, as I write this, and they’re still counting. Meanwhile, everything about the show I’m watching makes me feel better, even when someone chooses to make a steamed treacle pudding.

Because of this show I can now tell a fiddly from a stodgy sponge. I know – by sight, at least — proper royal icing and perfect ruff puff pastry. I know a biscuit isn’t a dog treat and jelly isn’t for toast. I might even be able to measure in millimeters, grams, and degrees C in a pinch.

I love that the bakers on this show are lorry drivers and stay-at-home mums (stet) and amoured (stet) guards and “pantomime producers.” I enjoy, in particular, the seasons with Sandi and Noel doing interstitial silliness. (No Hollywood Handshake? Go for the Fielding Fondle.) I love the side looks over the phallic fondant sculptures and the innocent talk of soggy bottoms, leaky cracks, and unpleasant textures in the mouth. I love the sounds – mixers spinning, fruit compote simmering, birds chirping, rain pattering — and the gentle tiptoeing competitiveness of the whole thing.

Continue reading

Science Plus/Versus Religion

Uncertainty is and always has been, for everyone, one of life’s non-negotiable facts. These days, what with politics and pandemics, uncertainty is also the whole country’s mood, a fog bank of unhappiness and anxiety that’s settled in everywhere and isn’t leaving any time soon. Everybody’s irritable and pissed-off and scared, and they’re taking it out on each other. This post is about two brothers whose personal antidotes to uncertainty seem wildly different. It first ran October 3, 2012, eight very long years ago.

I’m generally anxious though I doubt that I have Generalized Anxiety Disorder, or at least when I went to trustable-looking websites and read their lists of symptoms and took their little tests, I didn’t quite fit or pass.  But sometimes I get scared and jumpy and fretful and hyper-alert and shaky; I stop thinking clearly; I’m preoccupied by whatever it is that will  happen or might happen or could conceivably happen.  I really, really don’t like the feeling that I care, I’m invested, I’m involved, and then things go wrong and I’m not remotely in control. Actually I think I just have a heightened case of the human condition.

One day, with an anxiety like a low-lying fog, I was listening to a young man talk about his work, his interests, and his brother.  His work is to write software, to write code, which as I understand it, is a matter of breaking a problem into its smallest possible units and ordering them, line by line, so a computer can makes sense of the commands; it sounds like an analytical, orderly kind of job.  His interests are in science, all kinds.  “Did you hear about the Encode project?” he said.  “It was so interesting.” I wondered if what he liked was the genome ordering, line by line, the workings of the body and the evolution of the species.  I thought, not for the first time, what a comfort to an anxious mind is the world of science.

Then the young man told me about his brother.  They’d been brought up hyper-religious, creationist, home-schooled, And when the young man was a teenager, he began slowly to break away from his family’s beliefs and in the process, he said, his interest in the world outside grew.  And now he and his brother argue.  “God created the world in seven days.”  “Then how can the layers in ice cores show ages of hundreds of thousands of years?”  “God created layers in ice cores old.”  Same for the chicken and egg problem:  the chicken came first, God had created it full grown.  The young man is distressed about his brother and doesn’t like to let the disagreement lie.

But back when the young man was first breaking away from his family’s ways, he had noticed his brother was also following his own interests in worldly things — art, music, coding — and he wondered whether his brother might follow him further into the world. By this time, the young man was no longer living with his family.

Then one day, through a miscommunication, the young man thought his brother had died.  He believed it had happened, that he now lived in a world without his brother.  And when he found that his brother was still alive and then saw him in person, he became, he said, “very intense.”  His brother became very intense too, he said, and they were emotional with each other.  I picture awkward young men who maybe didn’t normally touch each other hugging and hugging and crying for a while.

But after that the differences between the brothers grew, the young man said, and his brother gave up worldly interests.  They have to avoid talking about religion; in fact, they have to stop talking about anything of substance at all: “when the answer is always God,” the young man said, “the conversation stops cold.”  “To be still talking at all, you must love each other very much,” I said.  “Oh yes, we do,” he said.  “Why do you think he became so religious?” I said.  “Because of that time I thought he was dead,” he said.

After that, both brothers felt for the first time the fact of death. Apparently the young man’s brother started thinking about how he should spend the life he now knew was limited.  The young man told me his brother concluded that he should invest only in lasting things and that bringing other people to God saves them from hell and does permanent good.  Religion orders life line by line too, I thought.  

Meanwhile, the young man continued, he too had started thinking about how to spend a limited life, only he concluded that he didn’t know enough about the world.  So he started reading, he said, reading everything, reading through the night, reading to the point where his work suffered, reading because he’d wasted his young life not devouring information. The brothers, though they love each other, are no longer close.

So, we’re all gonna die and we’re not in control.  Anxiety sounds like a reasonable reaction.  But order and meaning help, so we choose faith in God, we choose human understanding and science, we balance God and science.  I’m not going to say that science and God both come down to relief from anxiety and uncertainty, reduce to the need for order.  But yes, maybe, to some extent, I’m saying that.  

Anyway, I’m personally not cut out for faith in God, and when life gets explicit about its non-negotiable facts, I prefer human understanding and science.  I can’t say that I blame the brother though. I hope the brothers start talking again; at the least, I hope they remember they love each other.

_________

Photo credits:  Yaisog Bonegnashermhobl