The Youth Singularity

This post originally appeared in 2011, when apparently I had the sensation of technology accelerating into escape velocity. I could have had no idea what was to transpire 14 years later, but looking back at this piece, the toddler still seems like an emblem of the age—our new age of AI.

Little fingers swipe and stab at the iPad screen. An arrow traverses the “slide to unlock” bar and the monitor scrolls to the third page of apps, where YouTube’s icon zooms into yesterday’s search results. My one-year-old son chooses his favourite episode of Pocoyo – an animated, Spanish children’s show that’s been translated into English and narrated by the incomparable Stephen Fry.

Before my son was able to utter the word “poco,” directing an adult to find the TV program for him, he could do this series of actions to meet his own needs. When he tired of Pocoyo, he could press the square button to close YouTube, scroll over to the videos app and press play on Curious George, restarting the movie if necessary.

Much as I’d like to attribute his ability to early signs of brilliance, a more parsimonious explanation involves the intuitive user interface, combined with his native status in this generation of technology users.

Continue reading

Something Nice and Small

Delectopecten thermus, Yi-Tao Lin

Anyone else having trouble focusing? Me, too. This week, while trying to write this blog post, I spent an inappropriate amount of time looking at prepared meal delivery services with no plan to purchase anything. The food just looked so calm and pretty in its little jars.

So I do what I often do when I get stuck: I texted Helen to ask what she thought I should write about.

She responded almost immediately. “Something nice and small that knows nothing about the absolute [redacted] chaos around it.”

So, my friends, let me introduce you to Delectopecten thermus.

Continue reading

The Idiocy of Second-Guessing Order

This first ran on June 15, 2020 but it is about what happened the previous January. January 2020: things were objectively scary, what with an honest-to-goodness international pandemic and a blind-sided health community. I don’t think things have objectively improved since then, not on the whole, because even though that pandemic wound down, the next one is casting a birdy eye at us; and our leadership is objectively breaking records for human fuck-ups. Anyway, the sky is pretty orderly and predictable, and that was comforting then and still is and maybe for you too.

Last winter I was staying with friends who have a dark sky. (I don’t have a dark sky and even on clear nights I can hardly see Orion, which makes me sad but I’m used to it.) It was New Year’s Eve and as usual I bugged out early, went up to the guestroom, adjusted the blinds so that lying in bed I could see the sky, went to sleep. Fireworks at midnight, woke up, looked at the sky, watched the sparkles for a while, rolled over and went back to sleep. A couple hours later, my brain woke me up so it could look at the dark sky some more. I rolled back over, looked through the blinds at the sky, and there, sliding fast and exactly between the slats was a shining and glorious little meteor. Oh my! I thought. Oh my goodness gracious sakes alive! What an excellently superb way to start the new year, I thought.

I wondered whether my meteor was part of a shower. I didn’t know of any, though I looked it up later and maybe it was one of the Quadrantids, also maybe not. Anyway, I rolled over again, went back to sleep. But my brain had gotten obsessed with the sky and wasn’t about to give it up.

So I kept rolling over, looking, then rolling back over and going to sleep, then rolling over again, looking again and again. No more meteors. But the stars were so bright, one in particular which was maybe Arcturus or maybe Polaris, which in either case I thought was Venus because I wasn’t used to stars being so bright (Baltimore’s fault). Every time I woke up those bright stars were still there the way stars always are, always there.

Later, though, one time I woke up and looked again and the bright stars weren’t there. It must have clouded over, I thought. So I looked for clouds; no clouds. Then what happened? did something go wrong? Then I remembered that the earth turns, so the bright stars weren’t there because they had rotated behind the trees. Oh ha ha, I thought, silly you, forgetting that you should never second-guess the sky.

Which reminds me of the time years ago I got up in the middle of the night to look for an eclipse of the moon, the earth’s shadow crawling across the moon, turning it blood red. I looked out the window, no blood moon. The eclipse must be delayed, I thought, it must be running late. Then I remembered that eclipses don’t do that, eclipses are punctual, reliable, completely trustworthy. So I checked the clock again and yes, of course, I was wrong about the time. Don’t second-guess an eclipse either.

I love the mistake my brain was making — predicting the sky based on human norms. Second-guessing human events is fine, smart, a survival strategy: people are mistaken, things get delayed, situations get screwed up. When something is unexpected, isn’t going according to plan, look first for what went wrong. Our current combination of wired-in racism and a raging pandemic is a fine example, and the list of things that went wrong and are still going wrong must be setting some kind of historical world record for human fuck-ups.

For the universe, though, the standard operating procedure is order. The universe doesn’t go wrong. Even the change is orderly: the meteor follows the orbit of its disintegrated parent, Betelgeuse gets fainter and then brightens again. The universe operates lawfully on mostly-known physics.

I do love it when things that are so obvious and logical, things as widely-known as Newton’s laws, turn out to be a surprise. I love it even more when the universe continues to opt for order.

___________

Meteor, slightly cropped, by Tom Lee, via Flickr; Night sky, cropped, by Mathias Krumbholz via Wikimedia Commons;

Behavioral Observation

Colony: Punta Tombo, Chubut, Argentina

Date: 9 November

Site: RFID B

Nest: 708H

Nest type: Burrow, northwest-facing, mid-slope, concealed from above

Penguin: Male, toe-tag no. 14113/RFID no. 37189

Device: AX3 accelerometer no. 99290, day three of a five-day deployment

Nest Contents: Two eggs

Notes: Purpose is to ground truth time-stamped accelerometry data from AX3 with observed behaviors in an effort to determine how frequently an incubating penguin goes down to the ocean to get a drink, among other things.

Start time: 1635


Continue reading

Be Like This Tree

The tree

My favorite tree in the world grows about a mile along my favorite hiking trail in my neighborhood. I wouldn’t say it is the most beautiful tree; it is a little scraggly, and its trunk is not straight, and its needles seem a little thin. There are prettier trees on this particular trail, even, and certainly lovelier trees in other neighborhoods, and they are all perfect and their presence helps me to survive. But this one is my favorite, which is the right kind of tree, and also the toughest. 

My favorite tree of all trees grows right through a granite boulder. It is such a big boulder that it feels like it should be honored with a different title, like it is an extension of Earth, not a loose rock left there by a glacier. The large boulder is the size of an enormous boulder and it is so large it makes me think of Half Dome, or some other pluton.

The tree is growing through a crevice in this boulder, and the tree’s main root, which is serpentine and thirty feet tall and looks like a trunk, is expanding that crevice as it grows. It is forcing the rock apart, and consuming part of the rock and the dirt beneath it. 

The tree is the most determined living thing I have ever encountered.

Approaching the tree

I think about its genesis every time I visit it. I imagine two scenarios. 

Maybe, a seed fell onto a divot in the boulder, which was filled with dirt and pollen and other litter. Then the seed froze in snow, which ponderosa seedlings require for germination, and in the spring the seed sprouted. The small bit of litter provided nutrients. Its tiny roots took hold in the divot, and eventually pushed down, and its roots and the ice cycle split open the boulder. 

Or maybe, the huge crevice was there all along, and the seed fell from a bird’s mouth and slipped inside, tumbling all the way down. It froze, thawed, and took root. The tree then grew up through the crevice, feeling minimal sun, but finding shelter from the cold within the darkness of the boulder.

I am not a tree scientist, but I think either scenario is equally plausible. So either way, this tree as an infant saw some real difficulty, and persevered. Either it split a granite boulder and reached down, or it was consigned to live within the split and still made its way up toward the light. 

What I mean is that it is possible to find the light and to split open the darkness. It is not easy. Darkness will always return, on cycles that can last a day or a month or four years or a generation. But life will flourish, even when light is not pooling down easily and constantly, even when what little light there is must be actively sought.

What I mean is that a ponderosa seedling can do it, and maybe so can I, and probably so can you. Trust my friend, the bravest tree.

Underneath the tree

Nature Poetry: Heron Suite

Illustration of a heron flying through a twilit pink and purple sky

Note: This post is best read on a computer screen, but a phone’ll still work.

One day last year, my friend Tonya messaged our group chat with a lovely update: a heron had landed in front of their house to eat a fish. The rest of us were enchanted by the thought of it, but none more so than Tye, who’d misread the message and thought the heron had laughed, not landed, in Tonya’s yard.

An even better image, we agreed. “A heron laughed in my yard,” Tonya said. “Now everyone complete that poem.”

I did.

Continue reading

A Sevenmile Stream Story

This post first ran last January, but it’s just as relevant now.

Years ago, Carol Evans, then a Bureau of Land Management biologist in northeastern Nevada, told me she wanted to write a book called Stream Stories — a series of vignettes about the many creeks that webbed her region and defined her career. I have no idea if she’s working on this today (Carol, if you’re reading this, I hope you are!), but it always struck me as a brilliant premise. Streams and narratives have much in common: they flow between points yet never truly end, they are subject to the forces of history yet shape it themselves. And they both have protagonists — in the streams’ case, the living beings who dwell within them and, in some cases, sculpt their physical form.

Here, then, is my stab at a brief stream story, featuring a waterway called Sevenmile Creek. And, like so many good stream stories, it co-stars beavers.

Sevenmile Creek runs down a shoulder of scraggly pinyon-juniper forest that looms above Buena Vista, Colorado, a town on the banks of the Arkansas River. For the last several years, Sevenmile’s flow has been diminishing, for reasons that aren’t entirely clear — drought, perhaps, or some subtle change in hydrology or land use. Regardless, the dwindling water has spelled trouble for its resident beavers, which, though capable of transforming even the thinnest streams into robust ponds, can’t conjure water from thin air. 

One January morning, I paid Sevenmile’s beavers a visit with Mark Beardsley, Cat Beardsley, and Jessica Doran, three beaver aficionados who restore Colorado streams under the banner of a company called EcoMetrics. We walked a couple of miles down one of the gazillion rutted dirt roads that cuts across public land in this corner of Colorado, our dogs weaving around our ankles. Distant coyotes yipped and wailed. 

When the road reached Sevenmile Creek, we found it had gone virtually dry. A stranded beaver lodge, its normally submerged entrances yawning like cave mouths, stood in a damp meadow, the crumbling ruins of an ancient kingdom. I felt a twinge of foreboding. 

A little higher up, a colony of beavers was still hanging on, but barely. Behind the long berm of their dam, a frozen pond, no larger than a pickleball court, was tucked against a sheer rock face. Stains high on the granite wall revealed where the fast-disappearing water had stood months earlier. The shrinking, iced-over pond was nearly solid, locking into place the beavers’ food cache, the bundle of willow stems they’d spent the autumn assembling into place. Only one narrow aperture of open water, roughly the diameter of a five-gallon bucket, lapped against the rock: the colony’s single point of egress from its now-frozen stronghold. 

Beavers, of course, are well-adapted to winter; ordinarily they spend the chilly months feeding and frolicking beneath an ice roof as happily as Arctic seals. But this situation seemed abnormal, and perilous. Their stream had all but dried up, their food stores had frozen solid, and their pond was vanishing almost in real time. The beavers always had the option of leaving, that was true. But, since the stream only held sporadic pockets of water, that would mean waddling long stretches overland — not a semiaquatic mammal’s preferred mode of travel. And there were those howling coyotes to worry about. 

“I thought they’d high-tail it out of here when it got really bad,” Mark said as we surveyed the scene from atop a bluff. “But once they settle in, they’re like, no, this is home, man.”

“It’s so grim. Do you guys wake up in the middle of the night worried about ‘em?” Jess said.

“A little bit,” Mark acknowledged.

A week earlier, Mark and Cat had visited the colony and delivered a bundle of carrots, a food that captive beavers generally adore. But the veggies still sat untouched on the ice. (Maybe an encouraging sign that the critters weren’t actively starving?) They’d also spotted an adult beaver popping from the airhole to feed on what little willow wasn’t sealed into the ice. “He would stick his head out, grab one of those branches, and tug it under,” Cat said. 

Today the beaver was nowhere to be seen, though we heard the occasional hollow clunk of a portly rodent body moving around beneath the ice, and saw disturbed water rippling in the breathing hole. When we held our breath and the wind quieted, we could also hear the distant squealing and moaning of the kits, the babies, rising from some hidden burrow. It was hard not to interpret their calls as cries for help.

***

What, if any, is the moral of this particular stream story? It’s hard not to see it as an Anthropocene parable: the climate is changing, once-reliable resources are becoming ephemeral, our wild brethren are suffering, etc. And writ large, all of that is certainly true. 

But I’m also not certain that this evergreen lesson applies to Sevenmile Creek. Beaver literature is rife with analogous stories, in which smart observers become convinced that winter will spell doom for a favorite colony. The Colorado naturalist Enos Mills, in his 1913 masterpiece In Beaver World, described monitoring a beaver lodge whose sole occupant had been sealed in by ice during a cold snap. When Mills and a friend broke through the lodge’s walls and crawled inside, they found the beaver was successfully weathering the harsh conditions. “(H)e had subsisted on the wood and the bark of some green sticks which had been built into an addition of the house during the autumn,” Mills reported. Nevertheless, Mills, convinced the beaver looked “emaciated,” brought him regular deliveries of aspen for the next six weeks; eventually the pond thawed, and “again the old fellow emerged into the water.” 

Mills seemed to believe he’d saved the beaver’s life, and maybe he had; surely the critter appreciated the gifts. To me, though, it sounds like the beaver had fared just fine through his own innate intelligence and resourcefulness.

Or consider the author Hope Ryden, whose 1989 book Lily Pond did so much to endear beavers to the public. One fall, Ryden began to fret that her local colony, in which she’d invested so much time and love, hadn’t adequately prepared for the winter. “I had to conclude that their winter food larder left much to be desired,” she wrote, surveying their pitiful bushel of blueberry and mountain laurel. “Would they survive on such stuff? Why hadn’t they moved?” Like Mills before her, she delivered them aspen branches, doubtful they’d survive without help. “We’ve brought you Christmas dinner,” she told them upon dropping off one load.

Come spring, though, Ryden realized she needn’t have bothered: 

“(I) made a surprising discovery. The shoreline was littered with hundreds of blackened lily rhizomes, refuse that had washed up after ice-out. And each one of these had been partially eaten. So that was how the beavers had made it through winter! I examined dozens of the long fibrous roots, broke them apart and looked at their insides. They had the consistency of raw potatoes. Clearly, the beavers had dug these swamp roots from the bottom muck and been sustained by them throughout their long imprisonment. So our donation of aspen branches had not been necessary after all!”

The urge to worry about beavers, and even to intervene on their behalf, is obviously a common one, and perfectly understandable — we feed birds in winter, why not beavers? And many surely do die every winter, of starvation or predation or exposure; it’s obviously a perilous season for any creature. Yet Castor canadensis is also a flexible, clever species; beavers possess survival strategies and techniques, honed over millions of years of evolution, that we may fail to comprehend or credit. As the beaver-watcher Bob Arnebeck put it in one blog post about Lily Pond: “I always assume that beavers know their business better than I.”

So where does that leave the Sevenmile Creek stream story? Like sagas and streams, it rolls on. The Sevenmile beavers may well be in dire trouble, as they appear to be; when we visit them later this winter, we might find them gone, or dead. Bringing them carrots and cottonwood branches is, in my view, entirely justifiable and compassionate, given all the ways in which we’ve made their lives harder over the last several centuries; as Jess put it to me later, “Why not help a neighbor out?” But it’s also conceivable that they’ll find a way even without us, as they’re wont to do, drawing upon secret reserves of guile and creativity and preparedness. This particular stream story may yet have a happy ending.  

They have, after all, endured this long. “I figured they’d either move out or croak,” Mark said as we meandered back down the road and left the beavers to their own devices. “Well, they’re still kicking.”

Photos: the Sevenmile beaver pond and one of its occupants, courtesy of Mark Beardsley.