Caveat: I’m possibly having something like a Cassie-Willyard-Hubble-Moment here – in this case, I learn something new, don’t quite understand it but get all excited about it, and it’s, you know, wrong. Never mind because I’m all excited anyway because science has found a new way of being confident that what you know is right. Ok, confident enough that what you know is right enough.
I was reading about a defense department war game that took place completely inside a computer. Individual virtual terrorists worked together on an attack; the defense department had to catch them first and needed to find the method that would work best. So put the terrorists’ behaviors and tactics into a virtual world along with the defenders’ methods, and see whether a given method was any good at finding terrorists. No? you missed some terrorists and got blown up? Try another method until you find one that works.
I don’t think this war game was ever actually created but what do I know. Nor do I know whether this is actually an accurate description of the war game, nor whether it’s actually as similar to a game astronomers play as I think it is. Continue reading